If you don’t own a home now, you might have missed the boat entirely

You probably know by now that THC loves to keep tabs on the worsening housing shortage in California.

If you’ve been paying attention at all, you know that California’s housing inventory is falling far short of the mark. According to San Jose’s The Mercury News, if you don’t own a home now you just might never own one. And it’s going to get even harder for you to even find an apartment, too.

Here’s a link to a Mercury article from a few day ago that goes into the dire housing straits in California: California’s housing crisis – it’s even worse than you think

Some highlights? Well…(paraphrased from the article)

  • The state estimates that it needs to build 180,000 homes annually just to keep up with projected population growth and keep prices from escalating further out of control. For the past 10 years, the state has averaged less than half of that. In no year during that span did California crack the 100,000 barrier.
  • Rising rents are contributing greatly to rising homelessness. Between 2015 and 2016, California saw an increase of about 2,400 people. California accounts for about 12 percent of the nation’s population, but more than 20 percent of the nation’s homeless live here.
  • Gentrification in big cities is pushing low-income folks out of their homes. (Of course, this isn’t a problem in Humboldt, as anyone with at least one eye could tell you.)

And then there’s this: “The McKinsey Global Institute found that housing shortages cost the economy between $143 billion and $233 billion annually, not taking into account second-order costs to health, education and the environment. Much of that is due to households spending too much of their incomes on the rent or mortgage and not enough on consumer goods.”

Ouch. Good thing our state government is working hard to correct the situation, right? Not so much, as it turns out. Although there are a slew of bills that are aimed at correcting the problem, they’ll all fall short.

Lawmakers recently suggested a $9 billion dollar housing bond – but the nonpartisan Legislative Analysts Office says it will take more than $250 billion to fix the problem. For those not counting at home, our legislators are falling $241 billion short of the mark with their misguided efforts.

The answer? Well, it’s to build more housing, assholes.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to If you don’t own a home now, you might have missed the boat entirely

  1. same ol' same ol' says:

    giving people money to afford scarce housing is not an answer, but don’t tell Sackragmento that. Government subsides just drives cost up. Incentivise development, less duplicative regulation, make zoning laws realistic..? yeah, bureaucrats gonna actually help, ha.


  2. Disillusioned says:

    The old Jacobs School with more than 10 unused acres sits empty because the city council refused to rezone the land to multi housing. This could provide many new rental units for Eureka’s housing shortage.


    • the misadventures of bunjee says:

      The same goes for the old Zoe Barnum HS in Eureka. Lots of dilapidated, crumbling buildings with a parking lot on a prime spot a few blocks from an Elementary school. Why not build a number of duplexes and bring in some new families with kids? Or single moms struggling to get by but their kids can walk a block to school at least? Do to that property what was done out off Myrtle Ave. Oh wait, it’s city owned. They’ll let it burn to the ground before they let anyone get their hands on it.


  3. Rusty says:

    California Assembly narrowly passes affordable housing bills
    Gov. Jerry Brown will sign the measure. He tweets: “There’s no place like home. #SB2 #SB35”

    Build more homes for who?

    One Republican lawmaker, Assemblyman Brian Maienschein, of San Diego.

    “To do nothing for me is not an option,” he said. “I wouldn’t even be considering this if we didn’t have a state of emergency in the city of San Diego” over hepatitis A deaths in homeless people, he said.

    You can build a million more homes and theses “homeless” will still be homeless.
    Who’s gonna pay there rent? There daily job is to stealing enough money to buy meth and heroin.
    The only rental housing crisis is job holding qualified renters to put in them.
    Being on General Relief ,SSI ,Welfare and being a drug addict is not a qualified renter.
    Unless you’re talking about building public assistance housing, and that’s what this is disgusted as, it’s a lose lose for hard-working tax paying citizens.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s