THC solves AFD’s Fire Tax Conundrum

At THC, we have some really weird habits. Drinking Mike’s Hard Lemonade with tin-foil hats on, for example. Creating odd images on Photoshop. Reading old Humboldt Grand Jury reports on rainy Wednesday evenings.

naked-thc-in-tree

No, we didn’t Photoshop this one – we love climbing and hugging trees, too!

Occasionally, we accidentally do something worthwhile in the process. Such was the case today, when we decided to re-read the aforementioned Grand Jury Report. This particular report isn’t actually that old – it’s the 2014-2015 Grand Jury report, which you can also read (along with the rest of them) here. Particularly, we were interested in the Rural Safety report as it pertains to fire districts in Humboldt County. Responses to the report can be read here (Fire Chief’s Association) and here (Board of Supervisors).

So, while the hard-working Grand Jury (kudos to them for what they do, by the way!) makes some suggestions that we don’t necessarily agree with, one of their recommendations jumped out at us. Check it:

ruralsnipYes, covering all of Humboldt County might be a problem. Elsewhere in the report, the Grand Jury suggests looking into creating a County-wide fire district, which we think is unfeasible for several reasons. While having multiple fire districts in Humboldt isn’t necessarily the most efficient bureaucratic vehicle, we think an all-encompassing fire district (FD) loses something in effective emergency response to the many different communities in Humboldt. More than that, we think there’s just no way in hell the people in Humboldt would go along with such consolidation. Look at how many different school districts we have for cryin’ out loud!

However, THC had a small glimmer of an idea as it relates to the Arcata Fire District. We went on at length a number of times about why we didn’t like the recently defeated Measure A tax proposed by the AFD (you can read those posts here, here, here and here. Oh, and here. And there, too. Man, we really didn’t like that tax!)

However, rather than continue rallying the pitch-fork mob, we decided there was a tax the AFD could propose that more people might actually be in favor of. What if the AFD proposed to increase the geographic area that they provide services to? This would give them a larger tax base to provide for the many equipment upgrades they need. It may even allow them enough to hire the additional firefighters they want.

A big selling point of this expansion would be that moving the AFD into areas currently not covered by a conventional fire district would mean that residents of those areas which currently pay Cal-Fire fees – which people absolutely hate, in case you hadn’t heard – would no longer have to pay that fee. Their tax assessment’s would then feed into the greater AFD honey pot, and they might actually get some fire-protection services that way, too. I mean, lets face it, while all the volunteer districts try to do a great job and some actually do, an awful lot of them just don’t have the resources to put out a burn barrel much less a real fire. AFD has the resources and wants to use them. Maybe we should let them.

Of course, THC still feels very strongly that any such changes – and subsequent tax increases – should go first and foremost to expanding the number of people that receive protection from the AFD. While we understand that the AFD was previously pushing for increased firefighter staffing levels to improve the current level of service, we just haven’t heard anyone not associated with the FD that feels current staffing levels have impacted quality of service.

Since it seems that voters are quite happy with the present quality of service, we suggest that any future proposals or tax increases go into increasing the quantity of service. More people and areas served = more fire safety, greater tax base, and a more equal tax burden for all included within the Fire District. In that sense, THC thinks that we (and others) would be more amenable to an increase in tax-for-fire-stuff because we’d see an actual benefit to the larger public.

So that’s THC’s cider-fueled take on how the AFD could expand their tax base and tax intake, while also providing a sorely needed benefit for Humboldt’s more rural residents. Unfortunately, such Grand Jury inspired musings can make you real thirsty, so we have to run down to Murrish Market to re-stock.

In the meantime, please let us know your thoughts on the matter, THC fans.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to THC solves AFD’s Fire Tax Conundrum

  1. Marc Delany says:

    One thing people should note, the rural fire departments get 6 out of 7 calls for medical, not fire reasons… essential medical services.

    Like

  2. Not exactly says:

    You’re making a false assumption in that being within a fire district doesn’t mean you are excused from the CalFire fee. I have one property within the Humboldt Fire District and another within the Fortuna Fire District, both of which are (absurdly) subject to the CalFire fee. As for the AFD tax, the people have decided they only want 2 firefighters per engine. I disagree, but it’s a “you get what you pay for” thing, so that’s what they want, that’s what they get.

    Like

    • Cousin Eddie says:

      ***two paid firefighters. Maybe they ought to cut some of them top salaries and kick a little cash down to volunteers if they can be on call or show up.

      Like

  3. Tax Fatigue says:

    You mean expand the district to include the Trinidad/Westhaven metro area?… lol
    What wait…. Westhaven has a Vol. FD and AFD would probably assist like they already do with Humboldt Bay and Blue Lake if the shit really hits the fan. Heck they are such nice guys they even sent a big crew to Lake County this summer.

    Oh why would Trinidad/Westhaven want to jump on the tax happy prankster’s bandwagon?
    How about AFD sign up those 2,100 YES on A voters who are so hot to pay more property taxes, I wonder how many of them were actual property owners?

    From my tinfoil hat to yours, Subjects for possible further discussion:
    The Medical Aid calls….. how many are total BS… just Routine… or real Life and Death emergencies? Health Care by 911 in 2015 and beyond.

    The top AFD fire calls of 2015 off the top of my tinfoil hat:
    a couple Dows prairie tool sheds
    a smokey attic grow house
    a smokey oven
    a couple acre dune fire caused by bum-camps
    a smaller dune fire caused by hot fireplace ashes.
    weeds along the road
    weeds along the RR tracks
    abandoned rat infested building on alliance (arson)
    taxi driver hits barn on alliance
    several more bum-camp fires along the mad river
    vacant rat infested house on Boiler (arson)
    What else did I miss??

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s